| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
|||||
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
| Chat Line | Time | |
|---|---|---|
| vega7285: Yeah, pretty much. | 9 years ago at 10:00 am | |
| vega7285: I think it's easy enough to ask things slow down a bit. | 9 years ago at 10:01 am | |
| Miroku: but how much? | 9 years ago at 10:01 am | |
| vega7285: Or if you feel like it'd be better to get more people a chance to do thing,s could ask that everyone waits for at least one or two other people to post before posting again themselves. | 9 years ago at 10:01 am | |
| Miroku: *ditches her latest post* | 9 years ago at 10:01 am | |
| vega7285: there is no good or ideal solution, really. | 9 years ago at 10:02 am | |
| vega7285: A lot of the stuff I do is chat-based, which has its own issues of getting all participants together at the same time for a few hous once a week. | 9 years ago at 10:02 am | |
| Miroku: having to wait on people to post before posting again | 9 years ago at 10:03 am | |
| vega7285: It does avoid some of the issues ofwaiting on people or things advancing suddenly and unexpectedly because since everyone's there closer to real-time, characters can rspond very quickly to changing situations. | 9 years ago at 10:03 am | |
| vega7285: No method is really perfect, so we've just got to roll with what works. | 9 years ago at 10:04 am |
| Users: | 0 |
| Guests: | 31 |
| ZOL | 4 weeks ago |
| Wolfwood29 | 4 weeks ago |
| lam | 4 weeks ago |
| Nitrocosm | 1 month ago |
| Jovian | 1 month ago |