| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26 |
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
| Chat Line | Time | |
|---|---|---|
| Nitrocosm: I have no problem letting people have civil disagreements. That's the lifeblood of a good forum. Free speech for the open exchange of ideas - just no personal attacks or abusive behavior. | 9 years ago at 1:38 pm | |
| Miroku: No sexual harassment or racism though | 9 years ago at 1:38 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: Of course not. | 9 years ago at 1:38 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: Throwing around obvious slurs would result in a warning and a ban if it continued. | 9 years ago at 1:39 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: Now, promoting extremist ideas that are racist or sexist might get counter-arguments from me and others. If they're ugly ideas but not presented in an abusive manner, I might leave them be just so they can be refuted with logic. | 9 years ago at 1:40 pm | |
| Miroku: Really? | 9 years ago at 1:40 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: I think it's more effective to battle with logic and reason than to censor. I don't believe in "no-platforming". | 9 years ago at 1:41 pm | |
| Miroku: Well... as long as you don't tolerate someone using this forum to actively promote such ideas. | 9 years ago at 1:41 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: They set up the bowling pins and we knock them down, should that happen. Don't you think that would be more effective? | 9 years ago at 1:42 pm | |
| Miroku: It depends. | 9 years ago at 1:42 pm |
| Users: | 0 |
| Guests: | 93 |
| Nitrocosm | 2 weeks ago |
| ZOL | 2 months ago |
| Wolfwood29 | 2 months ago |
| lam | 2 months ago |
| Jovian | 2 months ago |