| S | M | T | W | T | F | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 |
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26 |
27
|
|
28
|
29
|
| Chat Line | Time | |
|---|---|---|
| Nitrocosm: In itself, it isn't important except that it sets precedent in terns of trademark and what YouTube will enforce. | 9 years ago at 3:38 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: The Fine Brothers were trying to abuse trademark law to corner the market on reaction videos and pressure other channels into licensing their "brand" in order to legally do reaction videos. | 9 years ago at 3:39 pm | |
| Wolfwood29: You know if it goes to court they'd be denied the ability to do that. | 9 years ago at 3:39 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: Right, but on YouTube, most people making videos can't afford lawyers. | 9 years ago at 3:40 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: So whatever YouTube enforces almost always stands. | 9 years ago at 3:40 pm | |
| Wolfwood29: - easy solution: Post videos elsewhere than YouTube! | 9 years ago at 3:41 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: YouTube, Facebook, Twitter... all "centralizing" the Internet. People go there because that's where all the people are (catch-22) | 9 years ago at 3:41 pm | |
| Helena: Last time I was on YouTube I didn't find anything all that cool except some music | 9 years ago at 3:42 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: Using YouTube to watch specific videos is different than subscribing and following a feed. The whole feed model is designed to keep people checking back often. | 9 years ago at 3:43 pm | |
| Nitrocosm: I guess that's beside the point, though | 9 years ago at 3:43 pm |
| Users: | 0 |
| Guests: | 15 |
| ZOL | 4 weeks ago |
| Wolfwood29 | 4 weeks ago |
| lam | 4 weeks ago |
| Nitrocosm | 1 month ago |
| Jovian | 1 month ago |